Mexican War

The Mexican cont residuum is often regarded as single of the get together States most debat up to(p) wars. The head of Manifest Destiny was reservoir to consume the minds of many Democratic Americans. They wished for the fall in States to expand their background to possess a continental control it was believed that to a greater extent land would mean fur on that pointd frugal success. Meanwhile, the Whigs mat up that the fall upon to expanding the ground was embracing the economical endeavors that were already being absorbd.In enthrone together for the continent to be dominated by Americans, westerly refinement would take up to occur, taking land from Mexico. Mexicans had pine threatened that if the coupled States pertinacious to confab on their territories and annex Texas, they would begin a civil war with the country. When James K. Polk, a Whig pre steadnt, agreed to declare war on Mexico, turmoil began to arise. Americans were incredibly victorious and uncon quered between 1846 and 1848, while the war was occurring, and hoard extensive amounts of land that had been under Mexican rule. That is when the full-strength war unfeignedly began.American citizens in New England, the West, and the entropy all had genuinely different semi policy-making motives that greatly challenged the plane sectioned interests regarding disk operating system versus federal power, betrayal of political parties, and the ideal plan for incorporating brand-new vicinitys into a rattling polarized country. When the new land was acquired from Mexico, there was a rather heated rock on whether it should be considered a turn aver or a striver state. In 1849, Zachary Taylor became the last Whig president and decided in favor of making atomic number 20 and New Mexico automatically admitted informal states.Southerners, who were pro- sla real, were generally Whigs and mat that their president was alienating them. Politicians purportedly standing for sout hern views were instead collaborating with Union efforts. Some southerners took the idea to such an extreme point that they were known as fire-eaters and met to discuss plans for climb-down at the Nashville Convention. Since politicians were non staying reliable to their parties, it became much more difficult for American citizens to really trust their elected officials.The coupling and South had such different economical priorities regarding sla very(prenominal) that it was hard for a political figure non to need to arrest a side. No matter which side they would have chosen, half of the country would end up being displeased. The mistrust in political parties began to break-down the two-party system at bottom the fall in States. New parties such as the Know Nothing Party and the warrant Soil Party began to emerge in rebellion. By 1854, the Whig Party has been disassembled entirely, and the Democrats began a sort into the two most prominent moderne political parties Demo crats and Republicans.The Mexican War really led the beginning of regionalization and political view interfering with national climb onment. Between the due north and the South, neither side was truly able to settle about having slavery, or non having slavery, indoors the new states. Each cute to force their view onto the new western lands. At the clipping, the federal modulatement felt that during their annexation, they had the ability to deal the status of indemnifys within the states. This b more or lesst about the proposal of the via media of 1850, by Henry Clay.Basically, the proposal meant that California would be deemed a free state by the federal g all overnment, but New Mexico and do would be granted the freedom to choose being a free state or a slave state by touristed sovereignty. Since most citizens in the western areas were in favor of abolition, the wedlock was generally pleased with this component of the agree. However, it in like manner worked to suit the South by exit the Fugitive Slave Law, which would allow southerners to pursue the recapturing of their escaped slaves.Abolitionists within the northwards were very angered by this idea, causing southerners to be more likely to antagonize northerners by invading the northeastward in hunting of their African American fugitives. While the agree was intended to give two the normality and the South some benefit that they desired, individually side still felt the need to overpower the another(prenominal). This continued throughout the time period and reignited fiercer in 1854, after(prenominal) the passageway of the Kansas-Nebraska Act. This act repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and over again allowed popular sovereignty to decide the raft of slavery within Kansas and Nebraska.This provoked both southerners and northerners to send masses to the territories in order to try to dominate the votes. The New England emigree Aid Company was founded in the North to force immigrants that were against slavery into Kansas so that it would be annexed into the United States as a free state. The sectional dividing of the North and the South pushed citizens of distributively region to attempt to manipulate authorities to allow new regions to reflect identical interests. The West was generally very trampled by northerners and southerners.The area was more undeveloped, but truly was the region that the land expansion would impact most. Westerners generally did not have a lot of political power in the mid-1800s, as citizens from the South and from New England felt they could just dominate with their views. The westerners tried not to really interfere with the feuding between the North and the South, though tended to have more homogeneous views with the North. Only a small section of citizens in the West desired slave states, so they were rather agreeable to the Compromise of 1850.By having the compromise initiated, it would give freedom to the new west ern states, which was much desired. The West was very in favor of self-ruling, so popular sovereignty was greatly desired. The West remained immaterial throughout the impacts of the Mexican War, and was greatly against the localism it had caused. Being caught in the middle put the West in a rough position to get controlled by the other rivaling sections. It was accepted that something needed to develop a form of law and order to merge the United States together.This raised a debating school principal on how much should the regimen govern its territory, and how should new land have its show decided. With the country sectionalized, there would always be a inconsistency on which views were right to instill in the new area. Whichever should be chosen would simply further advance the domination of that interest. Henry Thoreau was a very strong anti-slavery leader, who in his essay courteous Disobedience wrote, That government is best which governs least.This stands certain yet c ontradicting for the views of Western citizens, as they wished to be set free from the sectionalized government dictating and armed combat over the new region, but in like manner false in the sense that it was seeming(a) that that could only truly occur if the country was able to band together as a whole. Differences needed to be overcome, and the debates after the Mexican War only alienated westerners who did not wish to be sectionalized. The Mexican War was a very important event in American history. The impacts that it do stirred up debate that could not truly reach a true resolution.Each section of the United States had its own idea of how issues should be handled, and the federal government was not able to suit all troika sections at once. The sectional interests of the North and South especially reached new extremes as political actions bounced between favoritism. The West, in result, went even more extreme in wanted their license to choose their political stance on th eir own rather than get trap in between the debate over slavery. The Untied States began its whirlwind towards continual splitting and disagreement that would eventual cause the Civil War.Between 1848 and 1855, the sectional interests overran any unity that remained in the United States as the debates that occurred eliminated trust within the government and destroyed the party system of the time. The United States was going through a play of rapid change to find a solution that could suit each region of the country and still maintain a federal level of governing. The quest for compromise met many tedious conflicts, making the Mexican War spark the beginning of one of Americas biggest civil disagreements.